Predictions of compound activity for the two models—equivalent to the model output at the MEG sensor level (Figure S3)—and correlation between squeezed human and macaque best-ITDs histograms as a function of the squeezing factor are shown by the insets in (G) for the-limit (= 22.5°), and for the wrapped delay-line (= 36.0°). The human damped pattern (brown dotted line), the predicted model output using the squeezed best-ITDs—“human sqz.” (salmon)—and the predicted model output using the macaque distribution (purple) demonstrated a damping pattern with both models. The optimal squeezing factor was 0.51 with the-limit (G, inset, vertical dotted line), and 0.58 with the wrapped delay-line population (H, inset, vertical dotted line) and it was close to what one would predict from the ratio between macaque and human maximum ITDs (insets in G and H, magenta marker at 0.60) or the ratio between their head sizes (insets in G and H, red marker at 0.59). See alsoFigure S3.
